Talk:Edward Musgrave Blaiklock

"Heretic"
Presbyterian heretic Lloyd Geering. I agree with this designation, but it can't be called NPOV. Koro Neil (talk) 17:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)


 * It's certainly factually accurate in every last detail, and it seems that the creep set out to be just that. But the term "heretic" is Christian jargon.  It retains no useful meaning in general writing about modern times, as far as I can tell.  So we can't really use it.  (That Geering is indeed a self-serving scumbag who has lived off others for his entire life seems quite certain to me; but it is not for Wikipedia or its amateur editors to express an opinion on him either way.  It's fairer to quote people with whom we disagree (fairly and in a balanced way) and let them damn or save themselves out of their own mouths). Roger Pearse (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Musgrave Blaiklock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215075829/http://www.massey.ac.nz/~plineham/pubs/Ch6.doc to http://www.massey.ac.nz/~plineham/pubs/Ch6.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)