Talk:Effects of Hurricane Georges in St. Kitts and Nevis

Todo
I rated this as a start because I think the impact sections are quite small for a storm of such damage in the area. Other than that, this is a well written article. -- An ' ha ' mi  rak  12:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Notability?
Saint Kitts and Nevis are part of the Lesser Antilles. An article for them alone warrants no notability.Mitch/HC32 13:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's the severity of the damage in the region that makes the effects of Georges in these islands especially notable. There are numerous reports for these islands separate from the other islands. The article is still in the works but I wont be able to do much work until the weekend. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And? Its still worth it to be in the Lesser Antilles article.Mitch/HC32 14:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * To include all the information for just these two islands would give too much emphasis in that article which is for all the EC islands affected by the storm. The number of sources for this article already warrants it keeping the sub-article. There is a lot of aftermath, with funding and response continuing through the end of 2001. Also, the damage was nearly twice the GDP of the country, definitely catastrophic. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Still not worth it in my opinion. Its like saying Miami would get its own article.Mitch/HC32 14:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not able to get on IRC on the moment so, if you're on can you ask for the opinion of the other members in the project and have them put it here, just so we have a more inclusive discussion. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, let's think about this for a moment. It clearly meets WP:N, so the real question is whether or not it's suitable for a standalone article. On the one hand, this article does seem rather short, so at the moment it could probably be merged into a broader article. If the damages were that severe, then the Effects of Hurricane Georges in the Lesser Antilles page needs to place extra emphasis on these islands. That said, the damages do indeed seem to be fairly extreme, so I think it's worth looking for some more info. I think the best course of action currently would be to allow a few weeks for the article to be expanded to a level of comprehensiveness that would justify a separate article; failing that, it could be merged. Fair enough? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's probably better not go into sub-sub-articles. I'll merge it with the main sub-article shortly. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, that works. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)