Talk:Eggcorn/Archive 5

Debate / defend / reject / submit examples here

 * rot iron, or even more confusingly, rod iron, instead of wrought iron
 * Added by User:Cynthisa on 31 December 2011 with the edit summary "Rot/wrought iron". Cnilep (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's a nice example, as wright/wrought is pretty rare in contemporary English, and such specialized or archaic words are ripe for eggcorning. In agreement SherpaSam's comment, below, I don't think we need to comment on "more confusing" or less confusing examples, though. I'm also not convinced that it's necessarily a better example than "praying mantis", which Cynthisa removed. The two are probably equally good. Cnilep (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * chester drawers instead of chest of drawers
 * Added by IP user 184.174.140.46 11 February 2012 with no edit summary. Cnilep (talk) 03:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * prof-elastic instead of prophylactic I've heard my brother,  a H.S. dropout from Brooklyn, NY, make this mistake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.13.165.110 (talk) 21:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * duck tape instead of duct tape, and could of instead of could have. I think these are both more classic and widespread than some of the examples currently listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.71.159 (talk) 03:57, 17 February 2012
 * not eggcorns because why would could of or duck tape make “sense”? Jikybebna (talk) 12:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Duck tape had better make sense because it's the correct version. It's made with cotton duck. Duct tape is the eggcorn (and in this sense possibly the best example thereof, as it's so ubiquitous!). "Could of" is gramatically incorrect under all circumstances, though that doesn't specifically disqualify it. However, it's a simple malapropism.71.198.11.186 (talk) 04:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I have removed a section, "Which is the eggcorn?", created by User:Paulmlieberman discussing duck/duct tape. If there is no consensus yet on whether to add it as an example, I see no reason to add it as a section. Contrary opinions are of course welcome. Cnilep (talk) 00:01, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I thought it was worth its own section because it illustrates a (probably rare) situation in which a term was correct (duck tape) but is now thought to be an eggcorn for the currently common term (duct tape). Neither is actually an eggcorn; the referent has changed: the primary characteristic that gave duck tape its name (that it was made from duck cloth) is no longer operant. Though modern duct tape (which is not made from duck cloth) is not the best product for sealing air ducts, it worked well enough to save the lives of the Apollo 13 astronauts. User:Paulmlieberman (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, Cnilep, I think you are being too strict. The topic is probably of greater general interest than the majority of other examples that remain in the article.  With adequate clarification of which came first, it will enhance the reader's experience. Hertz1888 (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Which came first, the duck or the eggcorn? Paulmlieberman (talk) 14:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * paper mash-ey instead of ''papier-mâché
 * Added by User:Coin945 on 24 March 2012 with no edit summary. Cnilep (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * "McCaw" for "macaw" 98.177.248.112 (talk) 08:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Here, here for hear, hear Jikybebna (talk) 10:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Today I read sugar code for sugar coat.Jikybebna (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Isles when talking about isles in a shop. Maybe to homophonic for eggcorn? Jikybebna (talk) 12:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Eggcorn/Archive_4 for why adding more examples might not be a good idea. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 15:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * agree, but a) a long list of examples here would make it easier to find the very best for the short list in the article, and b) maybe there in the future could be a separate page list of eggcorns. Jikybebna (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure whether (b) would satisfy notability, but fair point on (a). My comment was a general one to anyone posting here. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 14:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * "Trail of thought" for "train of thought"--Coin945 (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * nerve-wrecking instead of nerve-racking Submitted from IP 184.4.221.85 on 2 July 2012. Moved here by Cnilep (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * damp squid instead of damp squib


 * make due instead of make do. This one occurs mostly in American English as far as I can tell and cannot occur in British English due to the differing pronunciations of 'do' and 'due'. This makes it a glaringly obvious error to a British English speaker instead of a more subtle error for an American English speaker. eyeball226 (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * crawlfish instead of ''crawfish" 71.198.11.186 (talk) 04:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Odd / Incorrect / Irrelevant wording in Example
The Wrought Iron example says "rot iron, or even more confusingly, rod iron, instead of wrought iron" I don't disagree with the terms Rod iron and Rot iron but, as Wrought Iron is commonly found in long thin forms, there is nothing particularly confusing about Rod Iron Rot Iron, on the other hand is confusing, as wrought iron is particularly known for it's resistance to rust (aka Rot). SherpaSam (talk) 03:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The example was apparently added without being discussed first. That's perfectly in keeping with Wikipedia's BE BOLD policy, but contrary to a consensus among several editors (including me) to limit new or changed examples on this page. I've restored "praying mantis" and moved rot/rod iron to the upper section of this talk page. Cnilep (talk) 06:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)