Talk:Eggplant Software

Conflict of Interest
The majority of contributions seem to be from the same region and usernames that indicate a connection to this company without proper notification on the user pages indicating a conflict of interest, paid or otherwise. Also, the tone of the article is not completely neutral. Specifically, two lines appear to be company marketing material:


 * Many of these products work together. For example, real user journeys from monitoring can be used to build journeys for functional testing.
 * It was created to help organisations put users at the centre of software testing to create amazing digital experiences and drive user adoption, conversion, and retention. After an initial round of seed funding ($100,000), the company was able to invest in developing technologies ─ predominately the Digital Automation Intelligence Suite ─ which interacts with software exactly like a real user does.

There are inconsistencies in formatting, such as the capitalization of list items.

The research section does not represent real research but is an extension of the awards section. The awards section doesn't need to indicate the company has won the Queen's Award. Just listing Queen's Award is guideline-appropriate.

This article requires either a substantial rewrite from a completely neutral party or conflict of interest indicators from the apparent company editors.

-Bwright — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.25.174.98 (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)