Talk:Egmont Prinz zur Lippe-Weißenfeld/Archive 1

Restoration of pre-existing condition of article
I have restored this article to its pre-existing condition because it was an Milhist A-Class article, and if an editor has significant issues with it, it should be subjected to a Milhist A-Class re-assessment, not subjected to a death by a thousand cuts, which is what is happening now. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Neo-Nazi publication
I removed citations to the fringe work Helden Der Wehrmacht: diff, and replaced with cn tags where applicable. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes there are, I will address them in the text. Dapi89 (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * re: this revert, the article now contains multiple citations to Helden der Wehrmacht – Unsterbliche deutsche Soldaten ["Heroes of the Wehrmacht – Immortal German soldiers"]. That it's a neo-Nazi publication is not an opinion; it's mentioned in Antisemitism Worldwide, 2000/1 as being offered alongside such book as "KZ-Lies" and "The Wehrmacht as Liberator". In addition, this book was classified as an extremist publication by Claudia Fröhlich and Horst-Alfred Heinrich.


 * Do you consider Helden Der Wehrmacht to be an RS source?
 * In addition, the revert also restored another neo-Nazi publication (Schaulen); please see: User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2016
 * Please advise how you plan to address these two issues. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and take it again. I can replace it. Dapi89 (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)