Talk:Egyptian constitutional review committee of 2011

cleanup to avoid redundancy needed
Between there is some overlap. i did a little work in removing redundancy without (hopefully) losing content some weeks ago, but now probably the main question is: where should most of the info on the constitutional change process of 2011, which will almost certainly continue after elections, go? Is it WP:NOTABLE enough to start a new article like 2011 Egyptian constitutional change process, or should it go in one of the three sections 1 or 2 or 3 above? It cannot all go into the review committee article, since political actors' opinions and reactions to the proposed amendments (some refuse them on the grounds that it will make a complete rewrite of the constitution politically more difficult) are not really part of the topic of the committee itself, the referendum will not be part of the committee, a new post-election committee probably will not be the same set of people (an elected parliament is unlikely to make exactly the same choice of appointing a committee as the present military government), etc. Boud (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Constitution_of_Egypt
 * 2) History of the Egyptian Constitution
 * 3) Constitution_of_Egypt
 * 4) Egyptian constitutional review committee of 2011 (this article)

Even more complicated: some info on the constitutional change process should go to Boud (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Egyptian constitutional referendum, 2011