Talk:Eileen and Robert Mason Pollock

2 NOT 1
THIS SHOULD BE TWO FUCKING PGS, NOT 1. THEY ARE INDIVIDUALS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.104.73 (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, why the anger and language? They are individuals, but the article is a stub, they are only notable as a couple/writing team, and all available references/credits (right now) are of them as a couple. Why have two identical/redundant stubs at this point? Sheesh. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 03:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In response to the latest "split" tag, I see no reason for 2 identical stubs. Even if expanded, I can't imagine there will be enough notable and sourced individual info worthy of separate articles. There are plenty of other combined articles, some of which are even more extensive and notable, like the Kray twins. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 08:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)