Talk:Einsatzgroupen

This "word" is half German and half English. Does it even exist anywhere in the real world? RickK 02:56, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Rick, the point is moot, as the page REDIRECTS to Einsatzgruppen, this word does "exist" for those who write it in an English style, so the REDIRECT helps that. IZAK 04:20, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Why should we have redirect pages at misspellings? john k 08:04, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Because not everyone is bound to Nazi spelling-conventions. Simple isn't it? IZAK 09:02, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Your characterization is offensive. RickK 14:52, 21 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Offensive to who, the SS? IZAK 09:24, 24 May 2004 (UTC)

Nazi spelling conventions? You've got to be kidding me. There are all of three google hits for "Einsatzgroupen". This is pointless. john k 16:50, 21 May 2004 (UTC)


 * So if there are at least three it means the word exists and deserves a redirect, right? IZAK 09:24, 24 May 2004 (UTC)

No, three hits means it's not even a common misspelling. john k 17:05, 24 May 2004 (UTC)


 * picky, picky, picky! IZAK 06:08, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

There are 6,820 google hits for "Holocost", 852 for "Holocust", 126 for "Holucaust", and so forth. Should these all be redirects as well? john k 06:13, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

Most definitely, why not? Are you worried about "wasting paper"? IZAK 04:40, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Also, none of the hits for "Einsatzgroupen" looks at all reputable. It is simply a misspelling, and should not be a redirect. john k 06:16, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

When is the last time you met a "nice" one? They are all terrible, even the ones spelled right. IZAK 04:40, 28 May 2004 (UTC)