Talk:Ekeberg Line

Factual error?
In the second last paragraph in "Threat of closure and renewal" where the article discusses the lack of suitable material after the removal of the Gullfisk in 1976, the article states "Instead, used SM91 trams from the Gothenburg Tramway were put into service."

I am unsure whether this is correct, because the SM91 were delivered to Oslo in the early 1990s (although of course, the SM91/M25 trams are much older than that). I wonder if the article are referring to the MBG trams, which were also imported second-hand from Sweden. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, that could very well be true. I think the source used the term "Göteborgtrikkene" or "Svensketrikkene" or something like that, and I just made an erroneous assumption of which one they were referring to. The book is back at the library, so I can't really double check. Arsenikk (talk)  11:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 one external links on Ekeberg Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article423126.ece
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noblad.no/nyheter/vil-forlenge-trikken-fra-ljabru-til-hauketo-1.5800041
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article1972873.ece
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ostkantavisa.no/nyheter/vil-ha-trikke-ring-rundt-gamlebyen-1.5713381
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314040054/https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/ to https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ekeberg Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101105071920/http://trafikanten.no/Gallery/1-GalleryRot/24-Rutetabeller/25-2010/26-Oslo/Sporvogn%20h101.pdf to http://trafikanten.no/Gallery/1-GalleryRot/24-Rutetabeller/25-2010/26-Oslo/Sporvogn%20h101.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article423126.ece
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noblad.no/nyheter/vil-forlenge-trikken-fra-ljabru-til-hauketo-1.5800041
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article1972873.ece
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ostkantavisa.no/nyheter/vil-ha-trikke-ring-rundt-gamlebyen-1.5713381

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)