Talk:Elaeocarpus grandis

Neutrality
The wording of this article (especially the statements that are not supported by the quoted references) and the inclusion of references that do not deal with this taxon, suggest that it is written with a predetermined opinion that the taxon is invalid. There is no doubt that it is disputed, but given that the Australian, Queensland and New South Wales herbaria (i.e. those herbaria in the places where this species is proposed to exist), and additionally the respected authority Plants of the World Online, all accept this species there must be a better and more balanced point of view presented in the article. I will continue to work on that aspect but input from other editors is welcomed. Junglenut &#124;Talk 10:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)