Talk:Elaine Murphy, Baroness Murphy

Untitled
When was she born?Max Mux (talk) 11:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Cello scrotum

 * oppose merge - article seems adequate to stand alone. PamD (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * oppose merge - it should not. There is too much merging, making the Wikipedia much less useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.29.126 (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * oppose merge. There are plenty more sources about this hoax than about the baroness herself. Xasodfuih (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * support merge - it's a very brief article and there is little scope for expansion. I don't see how merging it would make Wikipedia "less useful". MultipleTom (talk) 20:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * oppose merge. The Cello Scrotum article is notable, verified, has appropriate citations and stands alone. Adding the content to Elaine Murphy's entry would drown out the rest of her bibliographical information and distract from her real notability as a member of the House of Lords. 193.201.196.10 (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * oppose merge per PamD. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  09:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Clear consensus. I'm removing the merge notices. Fences and windows (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Elaine Murphy, Baroness Murphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101213115737/http://city.ac.uk/news/archive/2006/01_january/16012006_3.html to http://www.city.ac.uk/news/archive/2006/01_january/16012006_3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)