Talk:Eleasha Hamed

Non-Notability
the wife of someone famous is not an appropriate article; she has to have done something well known herself, and running a hairdressers doesnt cut it. Ironholds (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * There is a slim assertion of solo importance in the reference to "highly publicised court battle" that narrowly saves this from A7. Just from my own curiosity, I did a google news search and found 21 hits for it (here). I rather suspect this would be more appropriately included in the article about her husband, since (as bizarre as it all seems), it seems to be a continuation of an earlier driving incident involving the athlete himself wherein the driver against whom she lost the suit sued the athlete for hitting him. (http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article941478.ece here. And that's confusing even to try to describe.) I'm going to take a look at her husband's article and see if a merge proposal is appropriate. Alternatively, other deletion processes may be appropriate. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No merge proposal necessary. All essential information was already there, except the court outcome, and I've included it from scratch with a citation. I've accordingly redirected this per WP:BLP1E. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)