Talk:Election Special

C?
Do you ever rate above "C"? This article wasnt listed by me at WikiProject_Albums/Assessment, and you can rate it up to "B" (WikiProject_Albums/Assessment)

Now where in this article, and Rhythm Killers for that matter, did not fulfill:


 * A complete infobox, including cover art and most technical details.
 * A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians.
 * No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
 * No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.

Dan56 (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No, I do not rate above "C" because I do not check the sources and whether there are issues with them. It obviously meets "C"-class based on content alone. Assessments are never final and anyone can list something for an assessment if one feels it should have a higher rating, or someone else can just come along and reassess it. Most people don't even care, so I'm glad you take pride in the work you're doing. I'm just going to continue to help assess the 34,000+ remaining unassessed album articles, over 90% of which are either stubs or starts. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)