Talk:Electricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Hey LOVI33, it's been a while since we talked! I will review the article today! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Remove ""Electricity" was met with acclaim from music critics." The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Well written:
 * 2) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
 * Removed. LOVI  33  01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Too many quotes (WP:QUOTEFARM). Try paraphrase the bulk of the section. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I have re-worded most of them into paraphrasing. I hope its okay. LOVI  33  01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , for these comments, are you referring to the critical reception section? LOVI [[User talk:LOVI33|33 ]] 00:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Are you sure you need to include all of the information about the song charting in the UK? "t. It spent a total of 20 weeks on the chart, with 7 being in the top 10, 9 being in the top 20, and 10 being in the top 40" The Ultimate Boss (talk)
 * 1) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
 * 2) Verifiable with no original research:
 * 3) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * 4) all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
 * 5) it contains no original research; and
 * 6) it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
 * 7) Broad in its coverage:
 * 8) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
 * Removed so now it states that it spent 20 weeks on the chart. LOVI  33  00:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * 2) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
 * 3) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 4) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
 * 5) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
 * 6) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 * 7) Overall

LOVI33, Yes, it's the critical reception, sorry I forgot to mention that... The Ultimate Boss (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have addressed all your concerns. Let me know if you want me to do anything else. LOVI  33  01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

LOVI33, Everything looks good! I'm going to ✅ this! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)