Talk:Electronic hardcore

Redirect
The page was deleted; there was not enough well referenced information to support that electronic hardcore was ever an actually genre. The references only supported that there has been a recent fusion of post-hardcore with electronica, but did not define this as a new genre. With that in mind, I re-created the article with the SOLE purpose of redirecting it to information on wikipedia that discusses the fusion. Clearly the fusion is nowhere near notable enough for its own page, but information on it DOES exist, nonetheless. Also consider that links to this page exsist as well. These were "redlinks" until I allowed this page to redirect to an appropriate location. There is no reason whatsoever to remove this redirect. The page exists only as a means for the many individuals who use wikipedia to be able to find information on the topic, by redirecting to a section that discusses the fusion. Thank you for understanding :)   --   ♫ Chris-B-Koolio ♫    ...    (Talk)    20:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The deletion discussion determined that the article was original research, which does not belong anywhere on Wikipedia whether it's a stand alone article or a section on another article. Your request to redirect the article was not supported in the deletion discussion, and the result was to delete. From Wikipedia's policy on verification, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." Everything that is currently at Post-hardcore is just as poorly supported by sources as was this article. Both the article and separate section should be deleted. Your actions are going against the consensus of community discussion. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)