Talk:Electronic paper display

Changes
I've made a couple changes. Biggest one was the movement of the page as per Naming conventions (capitalization). Also, I added a proper introduction, and created a section for the original intro information. The page still does not define what a WTCD is, and that is a very large problem. WLU 12:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. I was going to move it myself, however my account wouldn't allow this until today.  I am planning on writing a proper intro.  I believe it can be properly differentiated from electronic paper. Cheers. Takenthesmeg

I think the page could use a bit more expanding before removing the context tag - it's still verging on a stub and you really have to read the electronic paper article to know enough to really understand it. One option is to merge the info and references into the electronic paper article. Up to you, think about it! Might save a lot of work and duplication later. Just my humble opinion. WLU 02:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * When I get a chance - hopefully sometime soon. I will go through all the reference material an expand the article.  Then, if that is not enough I will consider merging.  However, it may be that some of the Electronic paper article should be moved over to EPD.  As EPD is the term used by the E Ink Corporation, and may be the better term.  That is not to say I believe we should rename Electronic Paper - as this is clearly a separate definable concept.  Cheers.  Takenthesmeg 12:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Also note that we should not use a company-specific or proprietary term when there is a more general term used in the industry. The proprietary term can have its own article or be redirected to the more general name. Final point - WP:TALK, don't forget to space your posts with indents (using a ':' at the beginning of your post). WLU 19:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)