Talk:Elektron (satellite program)

January 2019 B-class review
I am recommending this article stay at the start-class. The article itself is well-cited, but doesn't do a thorough enough job of explaining the different satellites. The information under "spacecraft design" should also include information about the scientific payloads. Additionally, the "Missions" section should better explain the missions themselves, as it just has a short blurb about each mission. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review and fair assessment. I'll dig through the scientific papers and see if I can glean more about the instrumentation that way. --Neopeius (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Elektron1a.jpg
 * Elektron2a.png

Improving
Found a great resource with more information. Scientific payloads have been improved. Working on mission information (think there's stuff in AandA for 1964). At that point, will polish for B. I think GA will require more historical information. --Neopeius (talk) 18:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

B class
I think we're at B class now, having improved the spacecraft and mission/legacy sections. I'm going to see if AvWeekly has anything noteworthy to add. If so... we may be go for GA --Neopeius (talk) 03:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

GA
Reviewed AV. I think I'm done. The only places I could see improving would be to describe the experiments in greater detail in the article itself (but I don't think that's much use to the lay reader) and to go into more detail about the measurements made (again, may be too nitpicky). --Neopeius (talk) 03:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)