Talk:Elena Kagan Supreme Court nomination

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Elena Kagan Supreme Court nomination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121026024619/http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/06/02/some_in_gop_backing_kagan/ to http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/06/02/some_in_gop_backing_kagan/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Elena Kagan Supreme Court nomination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100630214041/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com:80/_news/2010/06/28/4575986-live-blogging-the-kagan-hearing- to http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/28/4575986-live-blogging-the-kagan-hearing-
 * Added tag to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-13/judiciary-panel-to-vote-july-20-on-kagan-s-nomination.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

No "Criticism," "Opposition," or Equivalent Section?
Hello all and thank you for taking the time to read this!

Many, if not most, Wikipedia pages profiling political figures and/or political events typically feature a "Criticism," "Opposition," or an equivalent section outlining the opposition to such a person and/or position. At the time, Kagan was a somewhat polarizing figure and the main body references this with respect to the gun debate. However, I think it would be more appropriate to move the sentences referring to the NRA opposition to a "Criticism" or "Opposition" section and add additional sources reflecting opposition to her appointment. Ideally, other topics/views would be added and sources contemporary to her nomination should be cited. E.g. "At the time, senators from both parties expressed strong reservations over her lack of judicial record during her 20 year career," which is citing an NPR/Salon article. That is just a single example: the section would have more examples and accompanying citations.

I welcome any thoughts, suggestions and/or comments!

--Lmt 7816 (talk) 16:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)