Talk:Elf Aquitaine

Removed POV comment
I removed the statement that


 * This has come under fire pre-Iraqi 2003 war. This also dissproves many conspiracy theories about Haliburton's involvement with Iraqi Oil fields.

The statement fails to explain how Elf Aquitaine's relationship to the pre-2003 Iraqi government has any bearing on the accusations against Halliburton, nor does it link to the page that documents the accusations. Furthermore, the statement that Elf's relationship "disproves" the conspiracy theories about Halliburton is, of course, a POV statement, besides lacking a clear causal link. Whether any accusation is proven or refuted is in the mind of the reader and constitutes POV; a statement reporting the known facts is acceptable. &mdash; JonRoma 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

I would also suggest that more detail about the nature of the Elf scandal were included in that section. Of particular use would be a statement naming the time period during which the alleged acts took place and the outcome (any criminal or civil penalties against the company or its directors/officers). &mdash; JonRoma 22:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


 * This is a very wide topic and you need to access French and German texts. With my rusty French I found the French page
 * https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Elf
 * and I think it contains most of what I have come across. Since a lot of corruption (and secret service) is involved much of the evidence has disappeared from the German language net and in France they discourage former secret service personnel from writing memoirs. Almuth Hauptmann-Gurski 2001:8003:A070:7F00:5C00:C403:7C93:416F (talk) 06:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Elf logo.jpg
Image:Elf logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Backronym?
The French version of this article states that the name Elf doesn't have any meaning, and that "Essence et Lubrifiants de France" would be nothing more than a backronym.BruceME (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * And according to corporate folklore, the name was generated by a computer (sources: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/67/Elf-Aquitaine-SA.html and http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/fue-014.html).
 * So yes, "Essence et Lubrifiants de France" is more than likely a backronym - albeit a very plausible one. Bluebird207 (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought it was énergie liquide á l'Aquitaine. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:F0A1:9D24:F362:546C (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)