Talk:Elihu Island

Revert-warring
What's the issue here? The information in this revert appears to be referenced. If it's false, then the newspaper in question is wrong. If it's outdated (not the same as false), then that's a different matter. Mackensen (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * So far as I can tell, it's simple vandalism which User:Marek69 and I have been reverting. Could you please explain why you labeled this as an edit war subject to 3RR, rather than simple vandalism which is not?  Could you please explain why the information you have been deleting - which is supported by multiple citations - is false, and provide evidence to support that? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2016 (UTC)