Talk:Elimination Chamber/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Review comments

 * Pre-review
 * Reading the review done about four months ago, there are some things that have not been fixed, chiefly for example: "The lead really fails to summarize the article. Per WP:LEAD it certainly needs to be longer, but even with a bit of common sense, you don't get a feel for the article such is its paucity." lead is still lacking length and information."
 * Write out some more for the lead and I will have that reviewed.


 * Lead
 * Of what there is so far, I think you should put "WWE" after World Wrestling Entertainment up there, so then you can abbreviate it for the first sentence of History section.


 * History
 * There are a few words that are linked more than once here or in the lead, and only the first mention of the word should be linked:


 * World Wrestling Entertainment
 * World Championship Wrestling
 * Raw
 * WWE Brand Extension (pipe-linked as "2006")
 * WWE Elimination Chamber
 * Match
 * Abbreviate the unit conversions, e.g. 36 feet (11 m) to 36 ft (11 m)
 * Spell out numbers whole numbers less than 10, except for dates
 * Again, there are words overlinked:


 * Raw
 * SmackDown
 * ECW
 * steel cage
 * Hell in a Cell
 * References
 * Reference #3 is simply a URL, add the details from the source
 * Reference #5 has an incorrect date

Summary

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I now believe that this article passes the GA criteria. If you wish to take this to the FAC, I highly recommend that you first add alt text to the images and spell out numbers less than 10. Anyway, great job and good luck on the WikiCup.--12george1 (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)