Talk:Elisabeth Christine of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel-Bevern

Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel not Brunswick-Bevern
the title says it all. I will move her to Elisabeth Christine of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, Queen of Prussia as the other Elisabeth Christine is the mother of Empress Maria Theresa Louis Philippe Charles (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

sister
It is obvious you don't have much knowledge about Frederick the Great; why should we accept your authority? I would be very surprised you added any details here about this woman. What you don't know is not necessarily wrong; that is a big problem on Wikipedia, for years. You could check and study the books before you revert. The information is right. My conclusion: you could be lazy. Taksen (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, now you sound like a person who has come to the internet just to find someone to argue with. You have added a piece of information to an article; I have asked you to provide a reference to it, to cite the reference; you refuse with the argument that "every book" in the article verify it; I ask you again to add a reference, but you refuse again, and now you insult me? How do you think that sound? You are now engaging in an edit war with me, and for what? Just because you refuse to reference information you yourself has added to an article. That is ridiculous, and it makes you sound like you are just here for a fight.
 * Now, this is the deal: I suffer from clinic depression and I often find internet disgusting because of the way people interact here: I'm sure you are a nice person irl, but on the internet, people are often angry and rude because they know they are anonymous and can therefore get away with it. If you are a serious contributor, you should know that: 1) you put the information in the article and it is therefore your responsibility to reference it, not mine: 2) It does not matter if you say that you know something, you have to reference it: 3) It is perfectly in accordance with Wikipedia rules for me to ask you to reference information, it is rather you who are breaking the rules by adding information you refuse to reference by claiming that every book in the reference verify it and referring to your own personal knowledge expecting everyone to believe you. Further: 4) I am a woman and therefore not interested in "messuring my penis", so to speak, by arguing about who knows most about the life of Frederick the Great, and : 4) I value having a good day, and being in a nice mood much, more than arguing with a stranger on the internet and have someone out looking for a random stranger on the internet ruing my day.
 * I you care about the article; reference your information. If you are just out to release your frustration by being rude on the internet: you have found the wrong person. I rather let you destroy every article you can find rather than having my mood ruined when I already suffer from depression. The fact that you are on the internet and therefore don't have to take responsibility for being rude is not a very good excuse. Good day. --Aciram (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

It is possible to add something like {{citation needed}), but it is ridiculous and rather stupid to revert information that is right.Taksen (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC) some people revert because they know better, but your revert when you don't have a clue. Not acceptable. Regards.Taksen (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Homosexuality of Frederik the Great
It is important for the reader to understand why exactly Frederik was not attracted to his wife: his homosexuality. The Radioactive Box (talk) 04:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Add it if you have a scholarly reference, but the fact that he wasn't attracted in his wife wasn't (solely) because of his homosexuality. He could be hetersexual and still not attracted to her. Heterosexual men are not attracted to every woman in the world, after all, so the reader could just assume that it was because he simply did not like her, regardless of his sexuality.--Aciram (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)