Talk:Elisaveta Bagryana

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elisaveta Bagriana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629222553/http://www.aba.government.bg/bg/BGpoSveta/Kariera/20050705-1.html to http://www.aba.government.bg/bg/BGpoSveta/Kariera/20050705-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 5 June 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure)  ~SS49~   {talk}  11:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Elisaveta Bagriana → Elisaveta Bagryana – The spelling in the lead sentence was changed on 3 August 2006, 13+ years ago. just moved this talk page without moving the article, citing WP:Romanization, which leads me to the Romanization of Russian essay and Naming conventions (Russia) proposal. Posting this here for review by others. – wbm1058 (talk) 11:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Dear Wbm1058, thanks for fixing my misplaced move of that talk page. By the way, the relevant WP Romanization is that of Bulgarian not Russian. Best, Apcbg (talk) 13:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Oops, so the dormant Naming conventions (Cyrillic) proposal then. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.