Talk:Elizabeth Nabel

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Elizabeth Nabel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012022908/http://www.strategicresults.com/ph/nabel.html to http://www.strategicresults.com/ph/nabel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Some proposed changes
Information to be added or removed: Nabel became faculty of the University of Michigan Medical School in 1987, and she became the Director of the Division of Cardiology and the Cardiovascular Research Center in 1992. She was the first woman to be appointed Chief of Cardiology at the University of Michigan in 1997. Dr. Nabel joined NIH’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in 1999 as the Institute’s Scientific Director of Clinical Research. Explanation of issue: Provides more specific dates and details about her career References supporting change: UMich Medical School Timeline https://www.med.umich.edu/cvc/timeline/ https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/directorscorner/previousdirectors/nabel-elizabeth-g.

Boston1234567 (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply 04-JUN-2019

 * Your edit request could not be reviewed because it is unclear which references are connected to which claim statements in the text of your proposal. When proposing edit requests it is important to highlight in the text, through the use of ref tags, which specific sources are doing the referencing for each claim. The point of these inline ref tags is to allow the reviewer and readers to check that the material is sourced; that point will be lost if the ref tags are not clearly placed. Note the examples below:

 The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles, while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles. The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.

References

1. 2.  3.

In the first example above there are three references provided, but the claim statements do not contain ref tags indicating which reference applies where. The links between material and their source references must be more clearly made, as shown in the next example below:

 The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles,[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.[3]

References

^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1. ^ Harinath, Paramjit. "Size of the Moon", Science, 51(78):46. ^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2. 


 * In the second example above, the links between the provided references and their claim statement ref tags are perfectly clear. Kindly reformulate your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. Regards, Spintendo  03:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed Addition to Career Section
Information to be added: In 2005, Nabel became the Director of the NIH’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and led the Institute until 2009. Explanation of issue: Fact to add to career section. References supporting change: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/directorscorner/previousdirectors/nabel-elizabeth-g. Boston1234567 (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply 04-JUN-2019

 * The URL provided with this claim is non-functioning.
 * The claim was added to the article and appended with a citation needed inline template until a functioning URL is located.
 * Regards, Spintendo  03:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Update: The reference information from a nonfunctioning URL has been located at another URL and added to the article. The citation needed inline template was removed. Regards,  Spintendo  07:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Blanked section?
Fillionaire claims I blanked a section here and invited me to talk about it here. I have no idea how my edit blanked anything; all I did was merge two identical citations, clean up some citation formatting, and change an apostrophe. -B RAINULATOR 9 (TALK) 02:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that, you're right! I reverted to your version. Fillionaire (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)