Talk:Elizabeth Wright (educator)

Wikipedia page is well organized and follows a cohesive flow.

Ashley: Perhaps revisit the Connecticut college section, and be more specific about what programs Wright instilled and why they matter to the Connecticut College legacy. Also, there are some grammar mistakes in some parts of this piece. Overall, very good job! It is very difficult to create a Wikipedia page on your own, but you definitely nailed it!

Joseph: Overall, well done. Your Wikipedia page provides the reader with a great understanding of Elizabeth Wright. Though I noticed punctuation marks were missing (e.g. commas, periods) throughout the article, this will require small fixing. I also think revisiting the Connecticut College section would be beneficial for the same reasons. Perhaps omit "Wesleyan Controversy and" and keep "Founding of Connecticut College" as the title for the section. In the legacy section, you noted a published novel. I suggest you make a section called "Publications" and include the citation for the novel there (feel free to look at Katharine Blunt's wiki site to see what I am talking about). Perhaps a detailed description of Wright's accomplishments as the secretary, bursar, and served on the board of trustees is needed in the Time at Connecticut College section.

Giselle: I think lengthening the introduction to focus on her personal developments would be a great addition to this page! A good amount of time is spent focused on the wesleyan controversy but I feel as though just a bit more should be focused on her acts in founding the college and her accomplishments but honestly: great job! super cool to be the first writing a section like this!