Talk:Elkhorn, Omaha, Nebraska

I think that mention should be made, here, or on Omaha's page about their unique ability to unilaterally annex municipalites under 10,000 persons. This is a Nebraska law that has enabled them to avoid the fates of such other midwestern cities such as Des Moines or St Louis where they get "boxed in" and can no longer grow while their tax base moves to the suburbs.

Inflammatory Anti-Omaha Section
Somebody has placed uncited, inflammatory material on this page. It has been deleted by users several times but then reverted by bots. Indeed it should be deleted as it doesn't meet sourcing requirements or NPOV. The only thing I saw there which could be improved that was not already in the article was a mention of an opinion poll from the residents of Elkhorn. If this can be cited and neutrally presented it would be ok, but I have no idea where the info came from. Alienmercy 17:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Removed Elkorn Page
Elkorn's 'official' page link removed, it is now an ad site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.96.1 (talk) 01:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Elkhorn, Omaha, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140826194916/http://www.court.state.ne.us/opinions/2007/january/jan12/s05-1006.pdf to http://www.court.state.ne.us/opinions/2007/january/jan12/s05-1006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Photo
I've again removed an 1867 photo of Elkhorn from this article. This is how the article appeared before I removed it. Note that text was sandwiched between the photo and the infobox, which is contrary to MOS:IMAGELOCATION. Since the photo was placed in a one-sentence section, it also forced the title of the next section to the right of the photo, which is also contrary to the principles of page layout and composition.

The editor who added the photo described it in an edit summary as "unique and necessary". Unique it may be, but "necessary" is overstating things. It wouldn't be at all inappropriate to include the photo in the article, were there a place to put it. Unfortunately, there isn't: the infobox takes up most of the article's right side, and a map of Omaha post-annexation occupies the rest. Since annexation takes up considerably more of the article than 19th-century history, it wouldn't be appropriate to delete the map and put the 1867 photo there. — Ammodramus (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Elkhorn, Omaha, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_pg=1636&u_sid=2312472
 * Added tag to http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=2337400
 * Added tag to http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=2338767

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Map attribute issue
I have come across this page from listing of this page under the category. I would like to know whether the attribute  be edited by someone. It is that parameter which causes the problem. I will be able to resolve the problem by replacing the dot with an equal to sign. But when that is done, it will show that the image does not exist. So my request is to just try if such an image can be found out or not. If it cannot be found out, just replace the full stop with an equal to sign.Adithyak1997 (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)