Talk:Ellen Jorgensen

Peer Review
Lead Section -topic was concisely and accurately stated in one sentence -summary of all major points was provided -all info present is also present in the body - could add wiki links to other wikipedia pages ex. Genspace has a wiki page which should be linked Genspace

Article Organization-flow of information makes sense, article follows a logical order

Content -all information provided makes sense, related to topic -wiki links to relevant articles should be added as stated before

Balace-the article is balanced, no one side is favored

Tone-the tone of the article is Neutral

Citations-all statements are well cited

Sources- all sources seem reliable and references are filled out

This new article gives comprehensive coverage of the topic. The body of the article is divided into relevant logical sections.

Changes I would make to this article would definitely include adding wikilcnks as stated before. I would also add an early life section, if information is available. If pictures can be found they would add to the article as well. I would also recommend moving the lead section to before the table of contents, so that it is the first thing a reader sees.

Mrt122495 (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
- Introduction has strong introductory sentence. Maybe give some context to what Biotech without borders and Genspace are. I also noticed that most biographies on wikipedia don't include sources in the introduction. - Article is well organized

- Education & Career: try to include where she was born and an early life section if you can find enough sources. Also include that she is currently president of Biotech without Borders (as well as Cooper Union adjunct). - Genspace: maybe rearrange the paragraphs a little. Put that Jorgenson stepped down at the end of the section as its own paragraph, and move the context about the company up. I like that you made a separate accolades section. - Publications: add some more context as to what type of publications they are. Maybe make sections for peer reviewed research/articles/ect. or include the journal they were published in or something similar so that the reader can figure out what type of publication it is without having to look at the full reference. Also, if she has so many publications you might want to mention that in an earlier section. Were most of them published at a certain school? or was it once she entered biotech? - Try to add more images - an image of her if you can find one, or else maybe the logo for biotech without borders as well

- Style is good, gets points across clearly and efficiently. Some of the sections feel like a list, so some smoother transitions would make it easier to read - Try to keep more consistency in referring to her as Jorgenson vs Ellen Jorgenson. I think once you switch to Jorgenson you can keep using that (except maybe at the beginning of a new section?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anc12 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC) Anc12 (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Anna