Talk:Ellie (The Last of Us)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 11:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments and Feedback

 * Copyvio rating: 37.9% chance
 * Half of the 'violations' are just the words "The Last of Us" so there's no real worry there.

The lead

 * [...] later assuming the role of the playable protagonist for a portion, a role she reprised in the downloadable content campaign The Last of Us: Left Behind.
 * I'm assuming this means; "the player can play as Ellie for a portion of the game which is then repeated in the downloadable content campaign The Last of Us: Left Behind."
 * Not too big of a deal, could be re-worded but shouldn't affect the overall outcome (IMO).
 * Edit: Since this has been posted, the sentence has been changed.

Character design

 * Everything is fine here Face-smile.svg

Attributes

 * Everything is fine here Face-smile.svg

Appearances

 * Everything is fine here Face-smile.svg

Reception

 * Everything is fine here Face-smile.svg

Overall review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and y:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Reviewer Comment: There were a few reverts (good faith) last month although they calmed down very quickly. I'm passing this section because no one violated the 3RR rule.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: (Pass)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Reviewer Comment: There were a few reverts (good faith) last month although they calmed down very quickly. I'm passing this section because no one violated the 3RR rule.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: (Pass)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: (Pass)

This article easily passes all (except for one, see the Reviewer Comment above) of the GA criteria. The only issue I found in the article is the sentence in the lead that isn't phrased very well. There is a good amount of imagery in the article, all Non-Free images have a full Non-Free template and the image of Ashley Johnson is under the Creative Commons. -- Anar  chyte   11:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)