Talk:Elmwood (Cambridge, Massachusetts)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 22:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon. MathewTownsend (talk) 22:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * review
 * Very nicely done. The history, which appears to be a major factor in its acquiring historical status, is well presented.


 * One nitpick: "Wings housing more modern services" - I can't find this in the sources. Is there a better word than "wings" which doesn't seem to have an architectural meaning on wikipedia.
 * I changed "wings" to "additions". The second page, third paragraph of the nomination PDF documents the exterior changes to the house. (NB one of the additions is described as a "service ell", which I have perhaps liberally interpreted as housing "more modern services".)  Magic ♪piano 14:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I made some edits that you're free to change.

MathewTownsend (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
 * b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
 * b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * c. no original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * no edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * no edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)