Talk:Elsa Lewkowitsch

infobox
the onus is on you to discuss why you are mass reverting infoboxes without discussion or consensus. the ORES with infobox is start "Start": 0.32089638345234517, "Stub": 0.6440866686951303 with infobox and "Start": 0.28451982985439, "Stub": 0.679817348821617 without. Beatley (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * the Objective_Revision_Evaluation_Service indicates that the infobox adds to the quality of this article. if you have questions about the algorithm, ask there.
 * i presented objective evidence, and you presented a subjective personal essay. Beatley (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Here's what I see when I read your comment: "9182389702eqr650ghubjhaofgljh". Write in English, not pointless scores from a pointless scoring device. As for your infobox, can you explain in English why you think it is such a good idea to take up such a large chunk of screen real estate (about 1/3 of the width on the first six lines of the article, on my display) for so little actual information (her birth and death dates and place of schooling, none of which is particularly significant with respect to the actual content of the article? It creates a show of being informative, but actually it makes our article stupider. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)