Talk:Embassy of Venezuela, Washington, D.C.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Embassy of Venezuela, Washington, D.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610031153/http://venezuela-us.org/consulados-en-eeuu/ to http://venezuela-us.org/consulados-en-eeuu/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610031222/http://venezuela-us.org/autoridades/ to http://venezuela-us.org/autoridades/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Claims of Original Research
made this revert claiming the material is WP:OR. Jamez42, please explain. The article (which had been previously cited as WP:RS for the article before the addition that has been reverted) says:
 * Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has repeatedly accused the United States of leading a coup against his government and said Guaidó and his international supporters are political puppets of the United States.
 * Vice President Mike Pence welcomed a new top diplomat from Venezuela to the White House Tuesday as part of the Trump administration’s strategy to help install new leadership in the South American country.

Please explain how the summary:
 * "part of Trump's strategy to install a new government, which Maduro calls a US led coup"

is inconsistent with these two quotes. --David Tornheim (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you have provided the quotes. As it can be seen, Maduro is the main person that has made accusations of a coup attempt; in this case, attribution is needed. A leadership is not the same thing as a government, as Guaidó is currently President of the National Assembly and has assumed an important role in the protests. Recognition of a head state is also far from "installing" it, and since this is both a controversial and disputed topic extra care should be taken with this definition. In short, attribution and complementary sources are important. Best wishes. --Jamez42 (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)