Talk:Embassy of the United States, Bucharest

Redirect
I repeat what I said in the original edit summary: other than the address, I see nothing about the embassy here. Embassy articles are about buildings, not bilateral relations. — Biruitorul Talk 20:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Biruitorul,


 * Thank you for your message regarding the deletion of the article on the Embassy of the United States in Bucharest. I understand your concern that the article should focus more on the embassy building rather than bilateral relations. However, I believe that the content of the article, as it stands, does adhere to several key Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which I would like to discuss.


 * WP:NOTABILITY: The embassy, as a diplomatic mission of the United States, is a notable subject. It has been the subject of reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, as demonstrated by the references in the article.


 * WP:VERIFY: The article is well-referenced with credible sources, ensuring that all material in the article can be verified.


 * WP:NPOV: The article maintains a neutral point of view, presenting information about the embassy and its history without any bias.


 * WP:NOR: The article does not contain any original research. It is based entirely on published reliable sources.


 * WP:NOT: The article does not violate the policy of what Wikipedia is not. It is an encyclopedic entry about a notable embassy and does not contain any promotional content, original research, or unencyclopedic material.


 * WP:RS: The article uses reliable, third-party, published sources, which are crucial for all Wikipedia content.


 * While I respect your perspective that the article could include more information about the embassy building itself, I believe that the historical and diplomatic significance of the embassy, as well as its activities, are also relevant and noteworthy. I suggest that instead of deletion, the article could be improved by adding more information about the embassy building and architecture. This would enhance the article's focus on the embassy as a physical entity while retaining the valuable historical and diplomatic content.


 * I propose restoring the article and collaboratively working to improve it, ensuring it aligns with Wikipedia's standards and policies. Your expertise would be invaluable in this process.


 * Looking forward to your thoughts and hoping for a constructive resolution. – Kjerish (talk) 21:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)