Talk:Embryo quality

added content
The following was added in this diff. This needs to be worked over for sourcing - there are 16 year old primary sources in here. The content is probably workable but it is written like a literature review, not a like an enyclopedia article. Will work on this; others are invited to as well.

-- Jytdog (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I've removed the content, as it is a copyright violation, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10809. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)