Talk:Emesa helmet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 15:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  15:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Criteria
GA Criteria:
 * 1
 * 1.a ✅
 * 1.b ✅
 * 2
 * 2.a ✅
 * 2.b ✅
 * 2.c ✅
 * 2.d ✅ (3.8% is highest.)
 * 3
 * 3.a ✅
 * 3.b ✅
 * 4
 * 4.a ✅
 * 5
 * 5.a ✅
 * 6
 * 6.a ✅
 * 6.b ✅
 * No DAB links ✅
 * No Dead links ✅
 * Images appropriately licensed ✅

Prose Suggestions

 * into the individualised portrait of a face, not sure, but should this be into an individualised portrait of a face?
 * National Museum are hidden in underground storage. should this be National Museum have been hidden in underground storage.? I think the past tense works better here.
 * Ornate yet highly functional, suggest Ornately designed but highly functional,
 * The latter circumstance may be more likely, for the acanthus ornamentation resembles that seen on Syrian temples. suggest The latter circumstance is considered more likely, as the acanthus ornamentation resembles that seen in Syrian temples.
 * That is all my comments, passing now. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  14:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your review, . I've adopted all your prose suggestions except the second; that sentence is supposed to indicate what the current status of the helmet is, hence present tense. Instead, I modified "in response to the Syrian Civil War" to "due to the Syrian Civil War," which I think makes it flow a bit better.
 * Generally speaking, is there anything you think I should consider adding or changing if I end up taking this to FAC? --Usernameunique (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Make sure images have citations if possible, and alt descriptions. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  19:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)