Talk:Emilio Elizalde

NASA ADS is quite enough
I do not see how NASA ADS could be judged non-reliable, etc. Wikipedia is full of pages of scientists in the same field of Elizalde having bibliometrics far worse than him. Thank you. 45 Wuz (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Which is why the article did not get a "notability" tag. However, WP is an encyclopedia and statements need to be verifiable by references to independent "reliable sources". I know that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. The correct response to that problem is to clean up those articles and bring them up to standards, not to lower our standards. --Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Why all this focus on bibliometrics? I think that the fact that his peers have seen fit to hold a conference honoring him is sufficient evidence of Elizalde's notability. His notability being established by such means, I'd even be tempted to delete mention of his h-index score. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)