Talk:Emily Gernild

re-created by Moceroci
I was involved in deleting a prior version of this article. Could you explain your reasoning for accepting this draft? Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * They seem to pass WP:NARTIST with work in the permanent collections of The Danish Arts Foundation, Trapholt Museum for Modern Art and Kastrupgårdsamlingen, happy for you to take it to AFD if you disagree. Theroadislong (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Is further information needed to verify the female artist provenance within more institutions and publications etc? Moceroci (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not concerned with the gender of the subject. Notability for artists criterion number four says "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." This article does not make plain that to be true. Show us where her works are in several notable galleries or museums. Exhibitions are not enough unless they were in a significant exhibition. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The text clearly states that her work is part of the permanent collections of The Danish Arts Foundation, Trapholt Museum for Modern Art and Kastrupgårdsamlingen. These are some of the most recognised institutions in Denmark. The link to Trapholt even includes an interview with the Director talking about the painting that they acquired. The artist is represented by Galleri Bo Bjerggaard which is one of the most recognised in Denmark - they represent the artists Per Kirkeby and Tal R among others. Can you let me know why these are not notable? Moceroci (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * provided needed sourcing, although we're still falling short of "several" permanent collections. I imagine based upon my recent experience that this would survive AfD. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please can you let me know why these are not notable? Please can you let me know why the box at the top of the article has not been removed. Do you need further information or credible sources? Moceroci (talk) 15:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I have already explained notability above. Of course, an editor like you who has a conflict of interest worries about the banner. That maintenance template is there to tell other editors that the paid contributions of folks like you have marred the article, and that a disinterested third party will need to check the content against the sources to verify the article honestly summarizes the sources. The template stays there until one of our experienced editors removes it. This is the price paid by those trying to use Wikipedia for advertisement. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I have not been paid to create this contribution and there is no conflict. I look forward to the experienced editors reviewing the article. Thank you. Moceroci (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)