Talk:Emily J. Miller

Untitled
This page needs updating on where Ms. Miller is working now. It seems she is no longer at One America News Network and the OANN webpage has scrubbed all references to her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.250.118.133 (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I object to the deletion because Ms. Miller is notable for her behavior in her position as an employee of famous individual. Her actions in the public/political sphere while an employee of Powell and DeLay -- including hijacking the camera on "This Week" during an interview with the Secretary of State -- are the basis for the entry, not her mere employment by them. Austinmayor 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Quite a hatchet (and a hack) piece for an allegedly "encyclopedic" website. 66.55.6.146 (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

The article felt way too one sided for Wikipedian standards, leading me to believe that it had been written by Emily Miller herself, presumably for promotional purposes. There was no mention in the article of the events most likely to justify its existence, namely the Abramoff debacle and the Powell outburst. That is why I decided to make a few edits. --Casinojackviewer (talk) 12:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Her year of birth is wrong. This Politico article of 2013 notes she was 42 at the time, placing her year of birth at 1970 or 1971. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/50-politicos-to-watch-emily-miller-094204 "The 42-year-old Baltimore native’s ..."

Reorganization--- back to basics
This article needs more basic information that you would expect to find in a typical Wikipedia biography such as : DOB, place of birth, parents, dates and places of attendance at schools, etc. --Wlmg (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Pronouns
According to Manual_of_Style/Gender_identity pronouns should be respected on Wikipedia: "Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with gendered words (e.g. pronouns, "man/woman", "waiter/waitress") that reflect the person's latest expressed gender self-identification as reported in the most recent reliable sources, even if it does not match what is most common in sources."

With my edits I wasn't trying to be funny, I'm just trying to get the article to adhere to the preferred pronouns as specified on Emily Miller's twitter: https://twitter.com/emilymiller

Unless anyone finds more recent sources of Miller's preferred pronouns we should stick to no/no on this article or avoid using pronouns. See also the discussion I had with Ingenuity: User_talk:Ingenuity

Pingiun (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Pingiun as User:Zaathras pointed out, saying "no/no" as their pronouns is just a joke to make fun of the LGBT community and shouldn't actually be used in the article. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Ingenuity Why should we not use it? If no has given a preference, I think that preference should be respected Pingiun (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Pingiun unless it can actually be shown that they _want_ to be known by those pronouns, which I highly doubt given that they are a right-wing media figure, the article should stay how it currently is. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I found an article they wrote on the topic: . So she doesn't actually want to be known by "no/no" it's just a protest against "wokeness". >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 13:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah thank you for finding this source. It does indeed make the intentions clear Pingiun (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)