Talk:Emma Albertazzi

Orphan tag after the fact
Hi there Voceditenore. Just wanted to say that I found it odd that you removed the orphan tag with this summary, "There are no suitable places to link at the moment and the massive tag is *not* necessary." I disagree. If an article is orphaned its marooned from the rest of the encyclopedia which is bad. The whole point of the orphan tag is to alert other editors to the fact that a particular article is orphaned and get many brains working on thinking of ways to inter-link the encyclopedia. Anyway, I racked my brain a bit and found four suitable articles to add links to Albertazzi, so problem solved. Remember that just because you might not see a good place to add a link doesn't mean that another editor won't. Tags are meant to help facilitate the collaborative process.4meter4 (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough :-) Voceditenore (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Kurt Gänzl corrects numerous errors in sources
Gänzl saw this article and wrote a long blog post about Albertazzi that states that most of the sources mentioning Albertazzi contain major errors. He reviewed contemporary sources and published this article, which I have used to update our article: https://kurtofgerolstein.blogspot.com/2019/05/emma-albertazzi-facts.html -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)