Talk:Emma Haruka Iwao

Not notable
Agree: not notable. The computation may be notable, but that is not enough by itself to make the person who did it notable. As mentioned, WP:BLP1E. 209.209.238.189 (talk) 10:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have to agree. What exactly makes her notable but not previous record-holders Shigeru Kondo, Sandon Nash Van Ness, and Peter Trueb? They all used y-cruncher to find digits too. Double sharp (talk) 07:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sources. If sources cover a rock, the rock becomes notable. It's not something we make up, or something that changes depending on the preferences of a given set of editors. Notability is something that exists in the sources and it doesn't matter who the Wikipedia editors are. The same evidence of notability exists regardless of who is there to see it. Also this was just at AfD, closed no consensus. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 07:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, Kondo was covered in multiple reliable sources, too: one two three four. But since this has just been at AfD and has been closed as no consensus, I'll stop here and drop it for now as (the lack of) consensus is unlikely to have changed so quickly. Double sharp (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC)