Talk:Emma Jane Greenland

May have been a pupil of Bach?
The phrase "may have been a pupil of Johann Sebastian Bach, and she owned some of his manuscripts after his death" is wrong/unclear/confusing. She (born 1760) sure as heck never met Bach (died 1750, ten years before her birth). Any manuscripts she owned were therefore clearly owned by her after his death. What are we trying to say here? Chris the speller  yack  20:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)