Talk:En Primera Fila/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mdann52 (talk · contribs) 17:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I feel that this is a clear pass, as it meets the GA criteria very well.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead gives a good overview on the article. It lacks source, however, the rest of the sourced content backs it up. No problems with any grammar/spellings in the prose, and sections are appropriate and relevent.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Overall, referencing appears ok, however, I am slightly doubtful about the reliability of the album cover notes, but I feel that enough notibility is shown elsewhere.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As well as giving facts about the article, it gives the background and other accociated information about the article.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No means of leaving a NPOV are in there.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Nothing shows up as an edit war recently, if at all.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images are appropriate, and tagged accordingly.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Clear pass, Good work!