Talk:Endeavour College of Natural Health

Is it really noteworthy to advertise this private (i.e., commercial) business? Opinions? --Editorcomm (talk) 00:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This article is now clearly commercial in nature, and should be written by an independent author. The author who wrote this article is associated with the college. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.16.212 (talk) 23:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

The key indicators that the article was written by the college as an advertisement for themselves is the use of words such as 'We' and 'Our', instead of 'Their', giving no doubt whatsoever that the article either a) was written by the college, or b) is in violation of their copyright. Either way, the article would require a fundamental rewrite in order to comply with Wikipedia policy.

In addition, the tone of the article is clearly designed to promote said college by outlining their unique selling propositions (for example "ACNM is now Australia's pre-eminent provider of education to the Natural Medicine sector. Our success at offering"... and "Providing the highest standard of education"). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.16.212 (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I removed the word "pseudoscience" to keep this article neutral. -A Admiralblur (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)