Talk:Endtroducing...../GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments - first up, sorry for the delay, you've waited long enough for a review! And a very nice article too.
 * Didn't notice the review comments – I'll take care of them now. Thanks for the review! Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 14:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "by the record label Mo' Wax." I think it would sound more natural as "on the Mo' Wax record label".
 * Addressed below by EditorE. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "entirely out of sampled " no need for "out".
 * Addressed below by EditorE. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Removed 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * " In creating its overall atmosphere" -> "In creating the album's overall atmosphere"
 * Addressed below by EditorE. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If "Midnight in a Perfect World" charted, like "Stem", why doesn't it have an article, or simply red-linked?
 * I don't know why, and honestly, there really is no need to make an argument like this in even a FA review. 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? If the single is notable, it should either be redlinked or have an article.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The song link is actually a redirect to the album article.
 * I've linked several instances of the song in the article. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "the beats he managed to create" -> "the beats he created"
 * Done. Holiday56 (talk) 07:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "out of sampled elements" -> "from samples"
 * Done. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "arrangements influencing countless other " countless is too much POV.
 * Removed "countless". Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * In the lead, you call him DJ Shadow once, then just Shadow throughout. Why not adopt this approach in the main body of the article?
 * "DJ Shadow" is mentioned in the body of the article, in the production and composition sections. Irrelevant argument here. 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No, not irrelevant. It's adopting a consistent approach to how you refer to him.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I've applied the necessary changes for the sake of consistency. Holiday56 (talk) 07:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "genre-bending works of art that merged elements" this must be a quote, so it needs attribution. Otherwise, it's no way neutral in tone!
 * Attributed to its author. Holiday56 (talk) 06:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "with almost all composition being done on the sampler" -> "being done"? yuck.  nasty prose.
 * Reworded. Holiday56 (talk) 07:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * "DJ Shadow has said that" has said, or just said?
 * Not sure what you mean by this comment; how would you suggest I change this particular phrase? Holiday56 (talk) 07:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at it, I think "has said" is fine. It's kind of difficult to explain, but it seems right to me. In a context like this, of an artist taking a retrospective look on his work, it seems appropriate.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  19:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ", by Mo' Wax" -> "on Mo' Wax"
 * Addressed below by EditorE. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 15:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll suggest the nominator to take care of these issues, as I'll be wanting to do other stuff on Wikipedia. 和DITOR  E tails 23:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Will do—thanks for making some of the necessary changes. Holiday56 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)