Talk:Engineering economics (civil engineering)

Article Evaluation
- Everything in the article is the relevant to the topic.

- Article is filled with accurate citations that come predominantly from physical copies of engineering economics textbooks and journals, from 1969-2018.

- Information is up to date and it is evident that the article is constantly updated and monitored.

- The way Wikipedia discusses the topic does not differ from the way it has been discussed in class. It breaks down engineering economics in a similar way as my professor, as microeconomics and focusing on the decision making process of civil engineers. Nve98 (talk) 05:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
After reading this article, I see that civil engineers have a large responsibility to show that money from the public will be used to benefit them greatly; can examples be added to the page to further show how engineering economics for civil engineers works? RichRome (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Regardless, everything that one should know about Engineering Economics was mentioned although more information should have been giving on the history of engineering economics and the pioneers of this social science. As well as major projects that have failed because of a lack of engineering economics been used Omkhulu (talk) 04:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)