Talk:Enough Said/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I will review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I could find practically nothing wrong with the prose and layout that is here. However, two things should be added:
 * In Critical response, you have no negative views on the movie. But those do exist, such as this one and this one. You should add another paragraph here.
 * A section on release on home media is missing.
 * Production: You might wanna add that the movie was shot on location. In Los Angeles could also mean in a studio.

That's it, great work so far! You have seven days to adress the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi and thanks for the review! I think I've addressed the issues you raised. 97198 (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Aaaand, it's a pass :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! 97198 (talk) 13:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)