Talk:Ensifer (bacterium)

Requested move 5 September 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Sinorhizobium → Ensifer (bacterium) – From the article: "In response to a request that the single extant species of Ensifer (Ensifer adhaerens) be moved to Sinorhizobium, a special ICSP subcommittee was formed to evaluate the request. It was ultimately ruled that Ensifer retained priority and that all Sinorhizobium species be transferred to the genus Ensifer. However, both terms continue to be used in published scientific literature, with Sinorhizobium being the more common. YorkshireExpat (talk) 20:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)"

I believe we should aim for correctness so propose moving the article to "Ensifer (bacterium)" with a redirect from "Sinorhizobium".

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support in highly technical areas like naming of species of bacteria, we should prioritise the officially established scientific nomenclature, even if the literature isn't doing a good job of following it. Mr248 (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)