Talk:Enter the Gungeon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 00:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I've actually played this game quite a lot, so while I don't normally touch video game articles, I figured I might take a crack at it.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I did do a couple tweaks here and there to make things flow better.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * I consulted WP:VGRS to make sure that every source cited was considered reputable for the sake of video game articles, and all of them passed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I feel the major points are sufficiently addressed. My only question would be if you could elaborate on the "Kill the past" thing.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good work! I'm a big fan of this game so I'm glad to see it getting some attention here.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good work! I'm a big fan of this game so I'm glad to see it getting some attention here.