Talk:Enthiran/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

You've really excelled yourself with this one. I can't spot any obvious issues with it, not stopping it from passing GA anyway. I think this has future FA potential. I urge you to open a peer review after this and prepare it for FAC. Make sure it is as comprehensive as possible, which it seems to be. It could use a copyedit by some capable editors I think in parts. but it's well on its way!♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)