Talk:Entrada (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Why does this feel familiar?
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * The review from Time seems to contain a few errors ("since its committed to", inconsistent italics, and some iffy grammar) - perhaps it's best to tag the quote with sic to prevent hypercorrection here.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * No problems here.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * Scope is grand. If you can come across some filming details they'd be lovely but it's fine as is.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutrality's good.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Sole image is used appropriately and is a free file. No problems there then/
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Quick pass for this one. Nothing new there! Well done again. GRAPPLE   X  02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Sole image is used appropriately and is a free file. No problems there then/
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Quick pass for this one. Nothing new there! Well done again. GRAPPLE   X  02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Quick pass for this one. Nothing new there! Well done again. GRAPPLE   X  02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)