Talk:Entrust Bankcard

added header
Admins, There is nothing advertising related in the article, no text promoting the company, no links to the company. Regards, Wiki Guru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki guru 425 (talk • contribs)

Despammed
The 2nd "source" was a quote of the 1st. Dropped. Dropped spammy opinion by Inc. Tightened and fixed grammar. Voila, a nice little stub for a little company. If it doesn't make it into the press soon, I think it should be dropped... it seems only newsworthy because it made the Inc. list.Shajure (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Despammed some more. I expect I'll keep the chatter removed unless some established WP editor disagrees with me.  Let your fans update your page once you have coverage in the press, there is no need to do it yourself.  You have an entire "Interwebz" for your advertising and to display your justifiable pride in your accomplishments.  WP is not that.  See wp:Pillars.
 * You are endangering the article. There are about 10 million more articles on WP that are more valuable, IMO, and if this one of very dubious wp:notability is too much trouble (distracts from the project), it may be best removed.Shajure (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed, leave your version (rolled back). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.47.92.202 (talk) 16:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Do not make misleading edit summaries. Do not claim that your work is mine.  If you believe this content you are adding has appeared in a reliable, published, 3rd party source, and that it belongs in WP, feel free to explain why here.  Otherwise, if you restore it, I will very likely remove it again.Shajure (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * A note: this puts me at 3 reverts today, so I expect not to make another. I will not be gaming the system by waiting until tomorrow to revert you again, should you continue to add this spam... I will be giving you time to reconsider.  You should leave the spam out.  Don't you have credit cards to process?Shajure (talk) 18:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * (cur | prev) 04:44, 20 September 2011 Shajure (talk | contribs) (1,857 bytes) (whitespace) (undo) -It was your version that was actually rolled back to...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.47.92.202 (talk)
 * False.Shajure (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Check out version history, it was all copy & pasted from the using the version comparison from (cur | prev) 04:44, 20 September 2011 Shajure (talk | contribs) (1,857 bytes) (whitespace) (undo)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.47.92.202 (talk)

redirect Foundation article
As I do not think the Engage Foundation article can possibly survive on its own, I've redirected it here and added some of the information from it. There is also the possibility of an article on Reis, but I would advise building up this one first.  DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC)